THE CONCEPTS OF AMANAT AND KIYANAT AS OPPOSITION

The article emphasizes the importance of conceptual study of terms that have linguistic meaning. In particular, one of the concepts reflecting the worldview of the Kazakh people was the concept of "amanat". For the cognitive disclosure of the concept of amanat, it is necessary to give a binary oppositional pair formed by the concept of "kiyanat" (abuse, violence), through which it is possible to determine the meaning of the concept of amanat for the people. To determine the application of the concept of amanat in the XIX-XX centuries, work was carried out with sources of that period, for example, the concept of amanat, found in the works of the traveler F. A. Fielstrup, the historian E. Bekmakhanov, describing that time, reflects the worldview of the people, as well as the analysis of proverbs and sayings that are firmly entrenched in the minds of the people, is widely reflected in this article. Kiyanat is widely discussed as a concept denoting violence, injustice, imperiousness and arbitrariness committed by a person when it is believed that the moral qualities of the offended person are destroyed. The concept of kiyanat forms a binary oppositional pair to the concept of amanat, hence we have grouped the types of abuse against a person, violence against oneself - an insult to the senses, lies, rude speech as an insult to the language. To determine how deeply modern society understands the concepts of amanat and kiyanat, a sociological survey was conducted, the results of which are presented in this work.

1. Tarasova I.A. (2020) Konczeptual`noe modelirovanie kak metodologicheskaya osnova analiza korpusnykh dannykh [Conceptual modeling as a methodological basis for the analysis of corpus data] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudavrennogo universiteta. Filologiya. #63. S. 178-190. http://journals.tsu.ru//philology/&journal_page=archive&id=1913&article_id=43718 [in Russian]

2. Tolstoy N.I. (1983) O predmete etnolingvistiki i ee roli v izuchenii yazyka i etnosa // Areal`nye issledovaniya v yazykoznanii i etnogpafii. Yazyk i etnos. [On the subject of ethnolinguistics and its role in the study of language and ethnos / / Areal studies in linguistics and ethnography. Language and ethnicity]. L.: Nauka. S. 181-190. [in Russian]

3. Grigoryeva T.V. (2015) Aksiologicheskie osobennosti oppoziczii «legkij-tyazhelyj» v russkom yazyke [Axiological features of the opposition "light-heavy" in the Russian language] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. #2 (34). http://journals.tsu.ru/philology/&journal_page=archive&id=1245&article_id=21811&page=&sort=email&sort_napr=desc&hash=d3829ae4c44413bd6c27213e4c49e34f [in Russian]

4. Grigoryeva T.V. (2019) Perczeptivnye oppoziczii: metodologiya issledovaniya oczenochnoj deyatel`nosti [Perceptual oppositions: methodology of the evaluation activity research] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. #60. http://journals.tsu.ru/philology/&journal_page=archive&id=1837&article_id=42165 [in Russian]

5. Generalova E.V. (2019) Ustojchivye sochetaniya, svyazannye s ponyatijnoj oppozicziej «pryamoe – krivoe», v istorii russkogo yazyka [Stable combinations associated with the conceptual opposition "straight – crooked" in the history of the Russian language] // Sibirskij filologicheskij zhurnal. #4. S.241-252. http://case.asu.ru/files/form_312-34256.pdf [in Russian]

6. Kudajberdiuly Sh. Adamdyk boryshyn. [Your human duty]. Bilim-All. https://bilim-all.kz/olen/1401-Adamdyq-boryshyn [in Kazakh]

7. Momyshuly B. Kanmen zhazylgan kitap. [A book written in blood] https://kitap.kz/book/425/read#epubcfi(/6/2[id1]!/4/2/2/1:0) [in Kazakh]

8. Akhmetova Z. (2017) Babalar amanaty. [The legacy of ancestors]. Almaty. - 280 b. [in Kazakh]

9. Makataev M. Khalykka khat. [Letter to the people]. Bilim-All. https://bilim-all.kz/olen/1121-Halyqqa-hat [in Kazakh]

10. Akhmetova Z. (1984) Shuakty kunder. [ Sunny days]. Almaty: Zhalyn, 1984. - 176 b. [in Kazakh]

11. Kunanbaiuly A. Zhigitter, ojyn arzan, kulki kymbat. [Guys, the game is cheap, laughter is expensive]. Bilim-All. https://bilim-all.kz/olen/492 [in Kazakh]

12. Kaidar A. (2009) Kazaktar ana tili aleminde: etnolingvistikalyk sozdik. [Kazakhs in the world of their native language: an ethnolinguistic dictionary]. Almaty: Dajk-Press. 1-tom. - 784 bet. [in Kazakh]

13. Fielstrup F.A. (2002) Iz obryadovoj zhizni kirgizov nachala ХХ veka [From the ritual life of the Kyrgyz people of the early twentieth century]. M.: Nauka. - 300 s. [in Russian]

14. Zhunissov A. (1992) Babalar dasturi; kazaktyn baiyrgy turmys-salt guryptary [Ancestral traditions: ancient Kazakh everyday life and rituals]. Almaty: Zhazushy. 1- tom. - 784 b. [in Kazakh]

15. Bekmakhanov E. (1994) Kazakstan XIX gasyrdyn 20-40 zhyldarynda. [Kazakhstan in the 20-40 years of the XIX century: a textbook.] Almaty: Sanat. - 416 b. [in Kazakh]

16. Kazaktyn etnografiyalyk kategoriyalar, ugymdar men ataularynyn kategoriyalyk zhujesi (2011) Encziklopediya. [Categorical system of ethnographic categories, concepts and names of Kazakhs. Encyclopedia]. Almaty: DPS. – 738 b. [in Kazakh]

17. Kazak tilinin tusindirme sozdigi (1982) [Explanatory Dictionary of the Kazakh language]. 6-tom. Almaty, «Gylym» baspasy - 624 b. [in Kazakh]

18. Al-Farabi filosofiyasy (2005) [Al-Farabi's philosophy]. Zhiyrma tomdyk /Kurastyrushylar A.Nyssanbaev, G.Kurmangalieva. Astana: «Audarma». 2-t. – 480 b. [in Kazakh]

19. Gandhi M.K. (1969) Moya zhizn. [My life]. M.: Gl. red. Vostoch. literatury izd-va "Nauka". Per: s angl. A.M.Vyazminoj, O.V.Martyshina, E.G.Panfilova, pod red. prof. R.A.Ulyanovskogo. [in Russian]

20. Kaidar A. (1998) Kazak tilinin ozekti maseleleri. [Actual problems of the Kazakh language]. Almaty: Ana tili. - 304 b. [in Kazakh].