MODERN CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LESSONS

The article shows the importance of the system of assessing the knowledge of students in English lessons through the introduction of modern assessment technologies. Attention is focused on the importance of the assessment stage as a fundamental one in the educational process system. The author emphasizes that the assessment method is not only a way to diagnose students ' academic performance, but also an effective tool for improving the quality of the educational process as a whole. In this regard, the activity of an English teacher in the application of popular, scientifically based assessment systems is the key to achieving the ultimate goal – to be the main motivator and teach a child a foreign language. In addition, this approach to the organization of the lesson allows you to increase the activity of students as objects of pedagogical influence. It is also emphasized that the assessment method is not only a method of diagnosing student performance, but also an effective means of improving the quality of general education. The article discusses in detail such types of criteria assessment as formative assessment, summative assessment, diagnostic assessment and feedback. Each approach is characterized by its significance and specificity in the educational process.

1. Urmashev, B.A. (2016). Kriterialdybagalautekhnologiyasy. Oқuқuraly. Almaty: «SSK» baspasy. -140 b. [Technology of criterion assessment. Textbook. Almaty: SSK Publishing House.140 p.] [In Kazakh]

2. Gultom, E. (2016). Assessment and evaluation in EFL teaching and learning. Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-4). Pp. 190-191. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/viewFile/6928/546265

3. Amos, I. (2014). Formative and Summative Assessment in Educational Enterprise. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(20), Pp.111-117. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/viewFile/14252/14560

4. Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80(2), pp. 139-148

5. Regier, N. (2012). Book Two: 60 Formative Assessment Strategies; OCPS Curriculum Services. Regier Educational Resources.

6. Bulatova, I. K. (2014). Razvitie navykov samooczenki uchashhikhsya pri formativnom oczenivanii [Development of students' self-assessment skills in formative assessment. Cited by: Kokhaeva E.N. (2014) Formativnoe (formiruyushhee) oczenivanie: metodicheskoeposobie. Astana: AOO «Nazarbaev Intellektual`nye shkoly», Czentr pedagogicheskogo masterstva. – 66 s. [In Russ.]

7. James, D., Schraw, G., &Kuch, F. (2019). Assessment & evaluation in higher education. Using the margin of error statistic to examine the effects of aggregating student evaluations of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1042–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1570482

8. Kokhaeva E.N. (2014). Formativnoe (formiruyushhee) oczenivanie: metodicheskoe posobie. Astana: AOO «Nazarbaev Intellektual`nye shkoly», Czentr pedagogicheskogo masterstva. – 66 s. [Kokhaeva E. N. (2014) Formative (formative) assessment: a methodological guide. Astana: AOO "Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools" , Center of Pedagogical Excellence. - 66 p.] [In Russ.]

9. Lahrichi, A. (2019). Study on the Effectiveness of Formative and Summative Assessment Techniques in Education. University of Sunderland. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333809381_

10. Carless, D., Boud, D. (2018). The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43:8, 1315-1325, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

11. Palmiero, C., Cecconi, L. (2019).Use of learning analytics between formative and summative assessment. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), pp. 89-99

12. Kamalova, S.T. (2014). Synyptaokushylardynokunatizhelerinbagalau: oku–adistemelikkural. Astana: «Nazarbaev Ziyatkerlik mektepteri» DBBU. Pedagogikalyk sheberlik ortalygy. - 44 b. [Kamalova, S. T. (2014). Evaluation of students' learning outcomes in the classroom: an educational and methodical manual. Astana: AEO "Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools". Center for pedagogical excellence. - 44 p.] [In Kazakh]

13. Negizgi zhane zhalpy orta mektep mugalimderine arnalgan kriterialdy bagalau bojynsha nuskaulyk: Okuadistemelik kural /O.I. Mozhaeva, A.S. Shilibekova, D.B. Ziedenovanyn redakcziyasymen. Astana: «NazarbaevZiyatkerlikmektepteri» DBBU, 2016. – 66 b. [In Kazakh]. [Guidelines for criterion-based assessment for teachers of basic and general secondary schools: educational and methodical manual /Ed. by O.I. Mozhaeva, A.S. Shilibekova, D.B. Ziedenova. Astana: AEO "Nazarbayev Intellectual Schools", 2016. – 66 P.] (In Kaz.)

14. Sistema kriterial`nogo oczenivaniya uchebnyh dostizhenii uchashihsja. Metodicheskoe posobie. Astana: Naczional`naya akademiya obrazovaniya im. I. Altynsarina, 2013. – 80 s. [A system of criteria-based assessment of students' academic achievements. Methodical manual. Astana: I. Altynsarin National Academy of Education, 2013. - 80 p.] [In Russ.]

15. Rawlusyk, P.E. (2018). Assessment in Higher Education and Student Learning. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. Vol 21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1194243.pdf

16. Allal, L. (2021). Involving primary school students in the co-construction of formative assessment in support of writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951164