A dialogical approach in an educational conversation on the topic of ethnicity and identity

This article presents a look at ethnicity from the point of view of some important sociological and socioanthropological theories and based on empirical data. One of these theories is Frederick Barth's theory of ethnicity. Everyday life communication and the practice of social interaction are the subjects of the study of ethnomethodology by Harold Garfinkel, and it is an important topic in the dialogic theory of Mikhail Bakhtin. In my study of ethnicity, these approaches, since it is in them that communication is given a primary role, are central and are also reflected in the research method - the method of conversational analysis. Two empirical examples from a rural hospital in Kazakhstan show speech genres in which the ethnic category becomes an integral part of the action and an important means of communication. In this case, the interlocutors resort to the ethnic category in order to clarify the identity of the person they are talking about. In such moments of social interaction, ethnicity is important for interlocutors not in the sense of collective group identity, which divides people into groups, covering up a person's personality, but as information necessary for recognizing and clarifying a specific personality. We are not talking about family, friendship or other close relationships in which the ethnic difference has either long been forgotten or did not matter at all, but about relationships where the interlocutors do not have sufficient information about each other. In this sense, ethnic categories can be compared to a certain extent with the name of a person. The author believes that the use of ethnic categories in everyday language speaks about the similarity of people, about their common speech practices, which are often dominated by stereotypical knowledge, about their common socialization, communication environment, worldview that developed at the beginning of the formation of the (multinational) Soviet state.

1. Бахтин, Михаил. 1996. Собрание сочинений. Москва: Русские словари. [Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1996. Sobranie sochinenij. [Collected works]. Moscow: Russkie slovari] (in Russ.)

2. Barth, Fredrik. 1969. „Introduction.“ In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. The Social Organisation of Culture Difference, edited by Fredrik Barth, 9-38. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

3. Bergmann, Jörg. 1987. Klatsch. Zur Sozialform der diskreten Indiskretion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

4. Bergmann, Jörg und Meyer, Christian. 2021. “Reflexivity, Indexicality, Accountability. Zur theoretischprogrammatischen Grundlegung der Ethnomethodologie.“ In Ethnomethodologie reloaded. Hg. Jörg R. Bergmann und Christian Meyer, 37-53. Bielefeld: Transkript.

5. Brubaker, Rogers. 2009. „Ethnicity, Race, and Nationalism.“ Annual Review of Sociology 35: 21-42 Валиханов, Чокан. 2010. Собрание сочинений. Алматы: Алатау. [Valikhanov, Chokan. 2010. Collected works. Almaty: Alatau]. (in Russ.)

6. Волошинов, Валентин (М. М. Бахтин). 1993. Марксизм и философия языка. Москва: Лабиринт. [Voloshinov, Valentin (M. M. Bakhtin). 1993. Marksizm i filosofiya yazyka [Marxism and the philosophy of language]. Moscow: Labyrinth] (in Russ.)

7. Enfield, N. J. and Stivers, Tanja. 2007. Person reference in interaction. Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

8. Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

9. Geertz, Clifford. 1996. “Primordial Ties.” In Ethnicity, edited by John Hutchinson & Anthony D. Smith, 40-45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10. Goodenough, Ward. 1965. „Personal Names and Modes of Address in Two Oceanic Societies.“ In Context and Meaning in Cultural Anthropology, edited by Melford E. Spiro, 265-277. New York: The Free Press.

11. Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. He-Said-She-Said. Talk as Social Organisation among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

12. Günthner, Susanne. 2000. Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion. Grammatische, prosodische, rhetorischstilistische und interaktive Verfahren bei der Konstitution kommunikativer Muster und Gattungen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag

13. Günthner, Susanne. 2002. „Stimmenvielfalt im Diskurs: Formen der Stilisierung und Ästhetisierung in der Redewiedergabe“ In Gesprächsforschung – Onlinezeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion (ISSN 1617 - 1837). Ausgabe 3 (2002). Seite 59-80.

14. Haviland, John B.. 1977. Gossip, Reputation, and Knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hirsch, Francine. 2005. Empire of Nations. Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. New York: Cornell University Press.

15. Meyer, Christian. 2009. „Ereignisethnographie und methodologischer Situationalismus: Auswege aus der Krise der ethnographischen Repräsentation?“ In Feldforschung. Ethnologische Zugänge zu sozialen Wirklichkeiten, Hg. Berger et al., 401-436. Weißensee Verlag: Berlin.

16. Moerman, Michael. 1968. „Accomplishing Ethnicity.“ In Ethnomethodology. Selected readings, edited by Roy Turner, 54-68. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

17. Sacks, Harvey and Schegloff, Emanuel. (1979) 2007. „Two preferences in the organisation of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction.“ In Person reference in interaction. Linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives, edited by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 23-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Schegloff, Emanuel. 1979. „Identification and Recognition in Telephone Conversation Opennings.“ In Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by George Psathas, 23-78. New York: Irvington Publishers.

19. Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. „Categories in action: person-reference and membership categorisation.“ Discourse Studies 9, no. 4: 433-461.

20. Schlee, Günther. 2006. Wie Feindbilder entstehen. Eine Theorie religiöser und ethnischer Konflikte. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.

21. Schütz, Alfred und Luckmann, Thomas. 2003. Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.

22. Sidnell, Jack. 2015. Conversation Analysis. An Introduction. Chichester: Willey Blackwell.

23. Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. „Moving forward with membership categorisation analysis: Methods for systematic analysis.“ Discourse Studies 14, no. 3: 277-303.

24. Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2018. ‚Talk‘. The science of conversation. London: Robinson.

25. Weber, Max. 1921/1972. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).