PARADIGMATIC NATURE OF COMPETENCE

The paradigmatic nature of competence is summarized by defining a disciplinary matrix based on an analysis of the history of the concept of competence at the international level Historical aspects of the development of science are analyzed T. Kuhn and describes the reasons for paradigmatic differences based on the thinking of Generation Z, which grows in the context of collaboration in social networks. Problems are identified in the implementation of competencies as a unit of content using traditional scientific procedures, and it is concluded that this competence is not an achievement of individual disciplines, but is the ability to adequately cope with the problem of the environment and life. It is also recommended to pay attention to the “paradigmatic competition” between communities in the development of educational content that increases the competence of Gen Z.

1. Sulejmenov I.E., Pak I.T., Mun G.A. Novaya paradigma obrazovaniya i nauki: predvideniya O.O.Sulejmenova. Vestnik Almatinskogo universiteta energetiki i svyazi. Specz. vypusk. 23-24 aprelya. S.56-68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326258087 (In Russian)

2. Kun T.S. (1975) Struktura nauchnykh revolyuczij. Per. s angl. I.Z.Naletova. M. http://psylib.org.ua/books/kunts01/index.htm (In Russian)

3. Keller Fred S. (1968) «Good-bye, Teacher…» Jornal of applied behavior analyses. Arizona state university. 1, 79-89. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-79

4. O'Connell, W. R., & Moomaw, E. W. (1975) A CBC Primer. Report of a Conference: Competency‐ based Curricula in General Undergraduate Programs. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED104297

5. White R. W. (1959) Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol. Rev. Sep;66: 297-333. doi: 10.1037/h0040934.www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13844397

6. Khomskij N. (1972) Aspekty teorii sintaksisa: /per. s angl. M. (In Russian)

7. Khajms Dzh. (1975) Etnografiya rechi. Novaya lingvistika. M.: Progress. Vyp. 7. S. 42-49. (In Russian)

8. Raven Dzh. (2001) Pedagogicheskoe testirovanie: Problemy, zabluzhdeniya, perspektivy /per. s angl. izd. 2-e, ispr. M.: «Kogito-Czentr». – 142 s. (In Russian)

9. Markova A.K. (1995) Psikhologicheskie kriterii i stupeni professionalizma uchitelya //Pedagogika. №6. S.55-63. (In Russian)

10. Delor Zh. (1998) Obrazovanie: Neobkhodimaya utopiya (doklad YuNESKO) //Pedagogika. №6. S. 53-54. (In Russian)

11. Hutmacher Walo (1996) Key competencies for Europe //Report of Simposium. Bern, Switzerland//www.fro.ru/etnopsy/pavl-formirovanie.html

12. Silva, V.V.M., Ribeiro, J.L.D., Alvarez, G.R., Caregnato, S.E. (2019) Competence-Based Management Research in the Web of Science and Scopus Databases: Scientific Production, Collaboration, and Impact. Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pp. 1-21. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v7y2019i4p60-d270142.html

13. Moghabghab R., Tong A., Hallaran A., Anderson J. (2018) The Difference Between Competency and Competence: A Regulatory Perspective. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 9(2), P.54-59. https://www.journalofnursingregulation.com/home DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(18)30118-2

14. Bergson A. (2008) Tvorcheskaya evolyucziya: sobr.soch. /Khrestomatiya po zapadnoj filosofii: uchebnoe posobie /sost., avt. predisl i vstupit.st. N.I.Fokina /pod red. V.I.Kirillova. M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt. – 544 s. (In Russian)

15. Kudajbergeneva K.S. (2012) Kuzyrlylyktyn pedagogikalyk kategoriya retinde damuynyn teoriyalyk-adisnamalyk negizderi. Monografiya. Almaty. - 340 b. (In Kazakh)

16. Teoriya pokolenij Shtrausa i Khou - Strauss–Howe generational theory. https://ru.qaz.wiki/wiki/Strauss%E2%80%93Howe_generational_theory (In Russian)