Preview

Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University

Advanced search

PERSONALIZED LEARNING BASED ON THE TYPE OF PERCEPTION OF LEARNING RESOURCES BY STUDENTS

Abstract

The article presents materials of research practice in teaching chemistry at the Nazarbayev Intellectual School. The study is based on the problem of students' difficulties in working with educational information, which makes difficult the development of information competence and natural science functional literacy. The objective of the study is establishing a correlation between the individual type of perception of information by the student, the nature of the learning resource provided by the teacher and the organization of work of the student with it, as well as educational achievements. The basis of research training is a differentiated approach as a special organization of personalized training. The results obtained allow us to establish: taking into account the individual type of perception of information in the proposed training ultimately ensures the progress of the student in an individual educational trajectory.

About the Authors

A. Zh. Murzalinova
Branch of the Institute for Advanced Studies«Өрлеу»
Kazakhstan

Petropavlovsk



A. G. Mechshanova
M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan State University
Kazakhstan

Petropavlovsk



N. T. Ualieva
M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan State University
Kazakhstan

Petropavlovsk



References

1. Принц М., Фельдер Р. (2007) Многоликая индуктивная педагогика и обучение // Журнал педагогической науки колледжа. Т. 36. - №. 5. - С. 14.

2. Deborah A., Kaminski P. J. (2005) Exploring the link between student learning styles & grades in an introductory thermal-fluids course. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, (pp. 10.508.1-10.508.16).

3. Chimmalgi, M. (2018). Off-line virtual microscopy in teaching histology to the undergraduate medical students: do the benefits correlate with the learning style preferences?.Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 67(2), 186-192.

4. Barbe, W. B., & Milone, M. N. (1982). Teaching through modality strengths: Look before you leap. Student learning styles and brain behavior, 54-57.

5. Nzesei, M. M. (2015). A correlation study between learning styles and academic achievement among secondary school students in Kenya. Unpublished Master dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Nairobi.

6. Gokalp, M. (2013). The effect of students’ learning styles to their academic success. Creative Education, 4(10), 627.

7. Wilkinson, T., Boohan, M., & Stevenson, M. (2014). Does learning style influence academic performance in different forms of assessment?. Journal of anatomy, 224(3), 304-308.

8. Hsieh, C., Mache, M., & Knudson, D. (2012). Does student learning style affect performance on different formats of biomechanics examinations?.Sports Biomechanics, 11(1), 108-119.

9. Amira, R., & Jelas, Z. M. (2010). Teaching and learning styles in higher education institutions: Do they match? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 680-684.

10. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematics and Financial Literacy. (2016) Paris: OECD.

11. Магауова А.С., Ермекова Ж.К. (2019) Инновационные образовательные технологии в высшей школе: Учебное пособие. – Алматы: ТехноЭрудит, 192с.

12. Grønmo, L. S., & Olsen, R. V. (2006, November). TIMSS versus PISA: The case of pure and applied mathematics. In 2nd IEA International Research Conference.

13. Fleming, N. D. (2015). The VARK Questionnaire. Retrieved from Vark a guide to learning styles: http://vark-learn.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/The-VARK-Questionnaire.pdf.

14. Руководство по критериальному оцениванию для учителей основной и общей средней школ: Учебно-метод. пособие. (2016) / Под ред. О.И.Можаевой, А.С.ШилибековойД.Б.Зиеденовой. Астана: АОО «Назарбаев Интеллектуальные школы», 56 с.

15. Oyama, Y., Manalo, E., & Nakatani, Y. (2018). The Hemingway effect: How failing to finish a task can have a positive effect on motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 7-18.

16. Dudley P. (2014) Lesson study: A handbook.

17. Sirazeeva, A. F. (2015). Person-Centered Approach in the English Language Teaching at the University. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1754-1757.

18. Alfehaid, L. S., Qotineh, A., Alsuhebany, N., Alharbi, S., & Almodaimegh, H. (2018). The Perceptions and Attitudes of Undergraduate Healthcare Sciences Students of Feedback: A Qualitative Study. Health Professions Education, 4(3), 186-197.

19. Koppenol-Gonzalez, G. V., Bouwmeester, S., & Vermunt, J. K. (2018). Accounting for individual differences in the development of verbal and visual short term memory processes in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 66, 29-37.


Review

For citations:


Murzalinova A.Zh., Mechshanova A.G., Ualieva N.T. PERSONALIZED LEARNING BASED ON THE TYPE OF PERCEPTION OF LEARNING RESOURCES BY STUDENTS. Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University. 2020;(2):25-34. (In Russ.)

Views: 1526


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-5079 (Print)