Preview

Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University

Advanced search

CRITICAL THINKING: MODERN DEFINITIONS AND PROBLEMS OF REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATES OF DIFFERENT LEVELS IN KAZAKHSTAN

Abstract

In this article, critical thinking is considered not as an educational technology, but an educational ideal. The question about the nature of critical thinking is still open, and the article provides the basic concepts and definitions that are important for further discussions. Nevertheless, the critical thinker has a set of properties that adherents of various points of view agree with. In the context of this set, the definitions adopted in our country are analyzed. Further, the inconsistency in the requirements for the level of development of critical thinking of schoolchildren and students is considered. At the end of the article, we examine main opportunities of integrating the teaching of critical thinking to students, aimed to eliminate that inconsistency and to get closer to the global educational ideal.

About the Authors

M. O. Kabysheva
al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



A. I. Niyazbaeva
al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Almaty



References

1. Государственная программа развития образования и науки Республики Казахстан на 2020 - 2025 годы утвержденная Постановлением Правительства республики Казахстан №988 от 27 декабря 2019 года.

2. Siegel H. (2013) Educating Reason. Philosophy of Education Research Library.

3. Dewey J. (1910) How we think?

4. Гегель Г.Ф.В. (1974) Энциклопедия философских наук. Том 1. Наука логики.

5. Рогачева Е. Ю. (2019) Американские университеты как источники профессионального развития Джона Дьюи и его научных взглядов // Проблемы современного образования. №03(3). С. 117–127.

6. Glaser E. M. (1941) An experiment in the development of critical thinking.

7. Lipman M. (2003) Thinking in Education.

8. Paul R. (1992) Critical thinking: What, why, and how // New Directions for Community Colleges, №77. pp. 3–24.

9. Bailin S. et al. (1999) Conceptualizing critical thinking // Journal of Curriculum Studies. №31(3). pp. 285–302.

10. O’Keefe D. J. (2002) Persuasion: Theory and Research.

11. Willingham D. T. (2008) Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? // Arts Education Policy Review. №109(4). pp. 21–32.

12. Battersby M. and Bailin S. (2018) Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.

13. Indrasiene V. et al. (2019) What critical thinking and for what? // Social welfare: interdisciplinary approach. №1(9), p. 24 – 38.

14. Facione Р. (1990) The Delphi Report. Executive summary.

15. Abrami, P.C. et al. (2015) Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: Meta-analysis // Review of Educational Research, №85(2), pp. 275–314.

16. Государственный общеобязательный стандарт образования Республики Казахстан 6.08.068 – 2010 (2010). Бакалавриат 5В011200 - ХИМИЯ

17. Центр педагогического мастерства АОО «НИШ» (2016) Руководство для учителя. Образовательная программа профессионального развития педагогических кадров в общеобразовательных школах «Рефлексия в практике».

18. Swartz R.J. and Perkins D. N. (2016) Teaching thinking: Issues and approaches.

19. Hitchcock D. (2017) On Reasoning and Argument. Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking.

20. Edwards L.C. (2017) The Craft of infusing critical thinking skills: a mixed-method research on implementation and student outcome // Journal on Centers for Teaching & Learning, №9, pp. 47–72.

21. Chartrand B.J., Ishikawa H., and Flander S. (2013) Critical Thinking Means Business: Learn to apply and develop the new №1 Workplace Skill.


Review

For citations:


Kabysheva M.O., Niyazbaeva A.I. CRITICAL THINKING: MODERN DEFINITIONS AND PROBLEMS OF REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATES OF DIFFERENT LEVELS IN KAZAKHSTAN. Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University. 2020;(2):151-159. (In Russ.)

Views: 462


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-5079 (Print)