INTERTEXTUALITY IN CONTEMPORARY ART OF KAZAKHSTAN IN THE ASPECT OF CULTURAL MEMORY

For the masters of modern art of Kazakhstan, along with the importance of samples of classical culture and discoveries of modernist art, Kazakh folk art is becoming a single field of tradition today. Intertextuality, constant dialogue with different layers of world and national painting and sculpture determine the search for new expressiveness in art. This article describes the role of intertextuality in the development of new forms of artistic statements, namely, as in the works of modern Kazakh sculptors (S.Bekbotayev, D.Sarbasov, Z.Kozhamkulov), jewelers (A.Mukazhanov), tapestry masters (A.Bapanov), the importance of the values of native culture as a space of cultural memory is preserved. Experiments with the material are perceived as a ritual, a creative act, a search for their own author's style, modern means of expression of the artist. It is shown that the danger of losing one's own national identity associated with the process of globalization explains the interest of the masters in the author's myth-making, designed to awaken the spiritual foundations of the nation in the minds of contemporaries. Through mechanical details, sculptors create new myths in order to streamline the ethical and psychological state of a modern person, while in the works of masters of decorative and applied art, bricolage is practiced as a combination of different materials and textures, meanings and images closest to the construction of a myth.

1. Kristeva Yu. (2000) Bakhtin, slovo, dialog, roman (1967) // Franczuzskaya semiotika. Ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu. [Bakhtin, word, dialogue, roman (1967) // French semiotics. From structuralism to poststructuralism]. M.: Labirint. S.427-457. [in Russian]

2. Ilyin I. P. (1996) Intertekstual`nost` // Sovremennoe zarubezhnoe literaturovedenie: Encziklopedicheskij spravochnik. [Intertextuality / / Modern foreign literary studies: An encyclopedic reference book]. M.: Intrada. – 319 s. [in Russian]

3. Bart R. (1989) Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. [Selected works: Semiotics: Poetics] .M.: Progress. – 616 s. [in Russian]

4. Man`kovskaya N. (2018) Postmodernizm v estetike (Postmodernism in aesthetics) // Filosofskaya antropologiya (Philosophical Anthropology). T.4. #1. S.192-230. [in Russian]

5. Arnold I.V. (1999) Ob`ektivnost`, sub`ektivnost` i predvzyatost` v interpretaczii khudozhestvennogo teksta [Objectivity, subjectivity and bias in the interpretation of a literary text] // Arnold I.V. Semantika. Stilistika. Intertekstual`nost`: Sb. statej. SPb. S.341-350. [in Russian]

6. Assman Ya. (2004) Kul`turnaya pamyat`: Pis`mo, pamyat` o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost` v vysokikh kul`turakh drevnosti. [Cultural memory: Writing, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity]. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul`tury. – 368 s. [in Russian]

7. Riker P. (2004) Pamyat`, istoriya, zabvenie. [Memory, history, oblivion]. M.: Izd-vo gumanitarnoj literatury. – 725 s. [in Russian]

8. Nora P. (1999) Francziya-pamyat`. (France-memory). SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU. – 328 s. [in Russian]

9. Installyaczii iz provoloki ukrasyat stoliczu (2017) [Wire installations will decorate the capital] https://www.inform.kz/ru/installyatsii-iz-provoloki-ukrasyat-stolitsu_a3386941 (data obrashheniya: 12.12.2020) [in Russian]

10. Lushnikova G.I., Osadchaia T.Iu. (2018) Modern existentialist novel: code-mixing. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. #11. P. 106-119.

11. V Esentai Gallery sostoyalos` otkrytie vystavki «Ritm tishiny» (2015) [The opening of the exhibition "Rhythm of Silence" took place in the Yesentai Gallery] https://kursiv.kz/news/pischa-dlya-uma/2015-10/v-esentai-gallery-sostoyalos-otkrytie-vystavki-ritm-tishiny (Retrieved: 05.11.2020) [in Russian]

12. Ostrovskij I. (2017) Pustoty v skul`pture Genri Mura [Voids in the sculpture of Henry Moore] //Iskusstvoznanie. Zhurnal po teorii i storii iskusstva. #3. S. 232-249. http://artstudies.sias.ru/upload/isk_2017_3_232-249_ostrovskiy.pdf (Retrieved: 07.12.2020) [in Russian]

13. Sharipova D.S. (2017) Problema ornamental`nosti v skul`pture Kazakhstana KhKh-XXI vv. // Kazakhskij tradiczionnyj ornament v sovremennom izobrazitel`nom iskusstve Kazakhstana. [The problem of ornamentation in the sculpture of Kazakhstan of the XX-XXI centuries/ In: Kazakh traditional ornament in the modern fine art of Kazakhstan]. Almaty: ILI MON RK. – S. 83-100. [in Russian]

14. Levi-Strauss K. (1994) Pervobytnoe myshlenie. [Primitive thinking]. M.: Respublika. – 384 s. [in Russian]

15. Tuleubaeva M. (2018) Almatinczy trut podkovu skul`ptury loshadi, chtoby obresti schast`e [Almaty residents rub the horseshoe of a horse sculpture to find happiness]. http://www.nur.kz/1759840-almatincy-trut-podkovu-skulptury-losadi-ctoby-obresti-scaste.html (Retrieved: 07.12.2020) [in Russian]

16. Oliva A.B. (2003) Iskusstvo na iskhode vtorogo tysyacheletiya. [Art at the end of the second millennium]. M.: Khudozhestvennyj zhurnal. – 215 s. [in Russian].