The main means of criterion assessment and their implementation into the educational process

The modern updated education system requires new innovations, according to this phenomenon, objective, fair assessment based on predetermined standards (criteria) is gaining momentum. Criteria-based assessment in this perspective is a wonderful solution, since criteria-based assessment makes it possible to understand what is assessed in the student's work and how exactly it is assessed. Thus, the criterion assessment has become one of the components of an updated educational process, which is aimed at the development of students' educational and cognitive competence and at assessment, which is designated by certain criteria, without comparing students with each other. However, despite the variety of methods and tools that can demonstrate students' achievements in various areas of development, traditional assessment, in which there are no clear and understandable criteria for evaluating the achievement of planned learning outcomes, has not gone into oblivion and is still actively used by many teachers in educational institutions. This article demonstrates a number of tools that can be used in criteria-based assessment, their main goals, as well as their contents. These tools are aimed at developing critical, creative, and communicative skills of students that are necessary in the modern world.

1. Krasnoborova A.A. (2010). Kriterial'noe ocenivanie kak tekhnologiya formirovaniya uchebno-poznavatel'noj kompetentnosti uchashchihsya : avtoref. dis.. kand. ped. nauk. Permskij Gosudarstvennyj Pedagogicheskij Universitet. [Criterion assessment as a technology for the formation of educational and cognitive competence of students: autoref... Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences. Perm State Pedagogical University]. N. Novgorod. 23p. [in Russ.]

2. Niyazova A. M. (2016). Kriterii ocenivaniya proektnyh i tvorcheskih rabot uchashchihsya po russkomu yazyku i literature [Criteria for evaluating students' project and creative works in Russian language and literature]. Problemy sovremennoj nauki i obrazovaniya. № 14 (56), S. 123-126. [in Russ.]

3. Urmashev B.A. (2016). Krıterıaldy baǵalaý tehnologııasy: oqý quraly [Criterion-based assessment technology: tutorial]. Almaty: «SSK» baspasy. 140p.

4. Rekomendacii po proektirovaniyu i ispol'zovaniyu ocenochnyh sredstv pri realizacii osnovnoj obrazovatel'noj programmy vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya (OOP VPO) novogo pokoleniya [Recommendations on the design and use of evaluation tools in the implementation of the basic educational program of higher professional education of the new generation]. Sibirskij institut mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij i regionovedeniya. Novosibirsk, 2013 73 s. [in Russ.]

5. Haagsman M., Snoek B., Peeters A., Scager K., Prins F. & Martijn van Zanten (2021). Examiners’ use of rubric criteria for grading bachelor theses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 46, No. 8, P. 1270– 1285.

6. Melnikova A.Yu. (2018). Kriterii ocenivaniya rezul'tatov proektnoj praktiki inostrannyh studentov-filologov [Criteria for evaluating the results of the project practice of foreign students of philology]. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta. №7 (196), pp. 79-86 [in Russ.]

7. Abiyeva Zh.Zh. (2020). Criterion referenced assessment in foreign language education: presentation as a tool. Bulletin of Kazakh National Women’s Teacher Training University. № 4(84), pp. 50-58 [in Kazakh]

8. Cambridge dictionary. URL : https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/presentation.

9. King, J. (2002). Preparing EFL Learners for Oral Presentations. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol. VIII, No. 3. URL : http://iteslj.org/Lessons/King-PublicSpeaking

10. Presentation Evaluation Criteria College of Adult and Professional Programs. Shorter University. 2011. URL : https://is.muni.cz/el/1433/podzim2013/PV072/um/43622742/PresentationRubric.pdf.

11. Bezukladnikov K.E., Krasnoborova A.A., Kruze B.A. (2012). Kriterial'noe ocenivanie rezul'tatov obrazovaniya: monografiya [Criteria-based assessment of educational outcomes: monograph]. 2 nd edition. Perm: Perm. gos. ped. un-t. 127 p. [in Russ.]

12. Kuzovlev V.P., Kuzovleva N.V., Pachina N.N., Samojlov A.A. (2016). Samoprezentaciya dostizhenij sredstvami tekhnologii portfolio (k pyatiletnemu yubileyu konkursa «Luchshee portfolio Lipeckoj oblasti». Regional'noe obrazovanie: sovremennye tendencii. [Self-presentation of achievements by means of portfolio technology. Regional education: current trends]. № 2 (29), pp. 132-135. [in Russ.]

13. Golub G.B., Churakova O.V. (2004). Tekhnologiya portfolio v sisteme pedagogicheskoj diagnostiki. [Portfolio technology in the system of pedagogical diagnostics]. Samara. P.5. URL: https://rus-pedagogicaldict.slovaronline.com/2518-Portfolio [in Russ.]

14. Pomorceva N.P. (2010). Tekhnologiya «uchebnogo portfolio» v diagnostike odarennyh uchashchihsya v shkolah SShA [The technology of the "educational portfolio" in the diagnosis of gifted students in US schools]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. № 2, pp. 29-33. [in Russ.]

15. DiMarco J. (2006). Web Portfolio Design and Applications. Idea Group Inc (AIG). USA, UK. 304 p.

16. Barrett Н. (2000). Create Your Own Electronic Portfolio. Learning & Leading with Technology. Vol. 27 No. 7, P. 14-21.

17. Kruze B.A. (2010). Formirovanie lingvomul'timedijnoj kompetentnosti budushchego uchitelya inostrannogo yazyka. [Formation of linguo-multimedia competence of a future foreign language teacher]. Perm: Perm gos.ped. un-t.. – 140 c. [in Russ.]

18. What is the ELP? URL : https://www.coe.int/en/web/portfolio/introduction

19. Haleeva I.I. (1999). Yazykovaya politika Rossii. Yazykovoj portfel' v Rossii. Rezul'taty 1 etapa pilotnogo proekta [Language portfolio in Russia. Results of the 1st stage of the pilot project]. M.: MGLU, pp. 3-5. [in Russ.]

20. Labazina L. N. (2003) Evropejskij yazykovoj portfel' – sredstvo ocenki i samoocenki znanij uchashchihsya po inostrannym yazykam [The European Language Portfolio is a means of assessing and self–evaluating students' knowledge of foreign languages]. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. № 2(35). [in Russ.]

21. Shekhonin A.A., Tarlykov V.A., Kleshcheva I.V., Bagautdinova A.Sh. (2014). Ocenka obrazovatel'nyh rezul'tatov v processe formirovaniya portfolio studenta: ucheb. posob. [Evaluation of educational results in the process of forming a student's portfolio: a manual]. SPb: NIU ITMO. 81 p. [in Russ.]

22. Educational measurement and evaluation. Ed. by Kulwinder Pal. Phagwara: USI Publications, Lovely Professional University. 401 p.

23. Caffrey Erin D. (2009). Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Education: A Primer. 43 p.

24. Franceva E. N., Prilepskih O. S., Kuznecova E. N., Doncov A. V., Korlyakova S. G. (2017). Tekhnologiya kommunikativnogo obucheniya kak sredstvo formirovaniya kommunikativnoj kompetentnosti studentov pedagogicheskogo vuza v processe izucheniya inostrannogo yazyka [The technology of communicative learning as a means of forming the communicative competence of pedagogical university students in the process of learning a foreign language]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta (TSPU Bulletin). № 4. T.7, S. 108-123. [in Russ.]

25. Bezrodnaya N. I. (2013). Kriterii ocenivaniya raboty studenta: formirovanie sistemy [Criteria for evaluating a student's work: formation of a system]. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomiki (Bulletin of the Taganrog Management and Economics Institute). № 1, S. 86–89. [in Russ.]

26. Kókіjanova G.K. (2009). Oqýshylardyń oqý jetіstіkterіn baǵalaý bіlіm sapasyn basqarýdaǵy negіzgі krıterıı [Assessment of students' academic achievements is the main criterion in managing the quality of education]. Almaty: Pedagogıka. 49p. [in Kazakh].