Preview

Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University

Advanced search

Semiotics of the fictional worlds: ideological (in)homogeneity of the transmedia franchises (by the example of fantasy stories and stories about superheroes)

https://doi.org/10.52512/2306-5079-2023-94-2-71-83

Abstract

The article presents the results of a semiotic analysis of fictional worlds in transmedia franchises. Fictional worlds of a number of popular fantasy narratives as well as stories about superheroes were chosen as the subject matter. In line with the goal stated in the introduction, this study focuses on how visual and narrative conventions encourage the circulation of certain connotative meanings between the various works of the transmedia franchise, maintaining the ideological homogeneity of its fictional world, as well as how a change in ideology can further develop the franchise and expand its fictional world. The work explored the connection between the concept of ideology and the opposition of good and evil in mass narratives. It was shown exactly how popular culture tries to demonstrate «genetic relationship» with literary classics and folklore through a rigid division of characters into «bad» and «good». A semiotic analysis of a number of transmedia narratives has revealed how the use of visual conventions in the representation of good and evil provides a preferred reading of the narrative by audience members. In a broader perspective, it is concluded that modern mass narratives, seeking to expand the target audience, are characterized by certain ideological flexibility, abandoning the ideology of white patriarchal capitalism, characteristic of earlier works.

About the Author

V. V. Furs
European Humanities University
Lithuania

PhD, Associate professor of the Department of Social Sciences

17 Savičiaus Str., 01127, Vilnius



References

1. Wolf, M.J.P (ed.) (2017) Revisiting imaginary worlds. – New-York, London: Routledge. 406 p.

2. Alzamora, G. (2019). A Semiotic Approach to Transmedia Storytelling // The Routledge Companion to Transmedia Studies. – New-York, London: Routledge. P.595 – 606.

3. Jenkins, H. (2010) Transmedia education: the 7 principles revisited http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2010/06/transmedia_education_the_7_pri.html

4. Hjelmslev, L. (2006). Prolegomeny k teorii yazyka. [Prolegomena to a Theory of Language]. – Moscow:ComKniga. 248 p. [in Russ.]

5. Kosikov, G. K. (1994) Ideologia. Konnotazia. Tekst (po povodu knigi R.Barta S/Z) // Barthes, R. S/Z. [Ideology. Connotation. Text (about the book by R. Barthes S/Z) ]. – Moscow.: Ad Marginem. Pp. 277-302. https://forlit.philol.msu.ru/lib-ru/kosikov4-ru [in Russ.]

6. Barthes, R. (1975). Osnovy semiologii // Structuralism: «za» i «protiv». [Elements of semiology]. – Moscow: Progress. Pp. 114 -163. [in Russ.]

7. Barthes, R. (1989). Ritorika obraza // Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika. [The Rhetoric of the image]. – Мoscow: Progress. Pp. 297 – 318. [in Russ.]

8. Eco, U. (2007). Povestvovatelnye struktury v proizvedeniyah Iana Fleminga // Rol' chitatelia. Issledovania po semiotike teksta. [The Narrative structure in Ian Fleming]. SPb: Simposium. Pp. 237 -269. [in Russ.]

9. Propp, V. (2001) Morfologia volshebnoi skazki. [Morphology of the folktale]. – Moscow: Labyrint. 143 p. [in Russ.]

10. Johnson J. (2012) Super-history: Comic book superheroes and American society, 1938 to the present. Jefferson, North Carolina, and London: McFarland. 220 р.

11. Cawelty, J. (1996) Izuchenie literaturnyh formul // Novoie literaturnoie obozrenye, № 22, pp.33-64. [The Study of Literary Formulas] https://www.metodolog.ru/00438/00438.html [in Russ.]

12. Aristotle. (1927) Poetika. [Poetics]. Leningrad: Academia. 121 p. https://imwerden.de/pdf/aristotel_poetika_academia_1927__ocr.pdf [in Russ.]

13. Losev, A.F., Shestakov, V.P. (1965) Istoria esteticheskih kategorii. [The history of aesthetic categories]. – Мoscow: Iskusstvo, 376 p. [in Russ.]

14. Benshoff, H.M., Griffin, S. (2009). American ideologies: discrimination and resistance // America on Film: Representing Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality at the Movies https://books.google.by/books?id=8PwiBBLhwGEC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=true

15. Peralta, C. (2021) Irony and Iron Man. The Marvel Cinematic Universe and the postmodern rejection of values // Isn't it ironic? Irony in contemporary popular culture. London: Routledge. https://www.academia.edu/71370061/_Irony_and_Iron_Man_The_Postmodern_Values_of_the_Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_

16. Perumov, N. (1993) Kolzo t'my. [The ring of darkness]. https://fantasy-worlds.org/series/id1819/ [in Russ.]

17. Vasil’eva, N., Nekrasova, N. (1995) Chernaia kniga Ardy. [The black book of Arda]. https://fantlab.ru/work11105 [in Russ.]

18. Frye, N. (1987). Anatomia kritiki. [Anatomy of criticism]. http://readeralexey.narod.ru/Library/Frye_1987.pdfPp. 232-233. [in Russ.]

19. Genette J. (1998). Povestvovatelnyi diskurs // Figury. [Narrative discourse]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Sabashnikovykh,1998. Pp. 60 – 280. [in Russ.]


Review

For citations:


Furs V.V. Semiotics of the fictional worlds: ideological (in)homogeneity of the transmedia franchises (by the example of fantasy stories and stories about superheroes). Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University. 2023;(2):71-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52512/2306-5079-2023-94-2-71-83

Views: 285


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-5079 (Print)