Preview

Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University

Advanced search

IMPACT OF THE ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES ON STUDENT’S ACHIEVEMENT WITH RESPECT TO DOUBLE INTEGRALS IN MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS

Abstract

Active learning is useful to engage and make an interest for the students in learning of mathematics, where the educators face many difficulties in teaching mathematics. This paper aims to address how to apply active learning strategies on the subject of double integral in advanced mathematics. We chose some suitable active learning strategies for using in the subject of double integral to show its designs. We also applied the active learning strategies which is shown in the introduction part for two groups from second year students in the faculty of science education at Suleiman Demirel University to reveal the of impact of achievement on the students. Comparing the achievement of experimental group to the control group, the authors deduce that the experimental group significantly outperform than the control group in the subject of double integral in mathematical analysis.

About the Authors

A. Almas
Suleyman Demirel University
Kazakhstan

PhD candidate, senior lecturer

Kaskelen



S. Kaymak
Suleyman Demirel University
Kazakhstan

PhD candidate, senior lecturer

Kaskelen



S. Кadyrov
Suleyman Demirel University
Kazakhstan

PhD

Kaskelen



References

1. Bonwell, C.; Eison, J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 978-1-878380-08-1.

2. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T.P. (1992). Learning and teaching with under-standing. In: D. A. Grouns (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-92). New York: Macmillan.

3. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.

4. Berkeley university of California. (2019). Berkeley center for teaching and learning. Retrieved from Active Learning Strategies: https://teaching.berkeley.edu/active-learning-strategies

5. Barnes, D. R. (1989). Active learning. Leeds University TVEI Support Project.

6. Şahin, M. (2007). The Importance of Efficiency in Active Learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 4(2).

7. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

8. Glenda Anthony(1996) Educational Studies in Mathematics, Volume 31, Number 4, Page 349

9. The Active Learners Institute. (2011, January). The Active Learners Institute. Retrieved from The Active Learners Institute Web site: https://sites.google.com/site/activelearnersinstitute/active-learning-retention-rates

10. Frey, B.B. (2018). Posttest-Only Control Group Design. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n530

11. Grace Adebisi Fayombo (2013) .World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering Vol:7, No:7


Review

For citations:


Almas A., Kaymak S., Кadyrov S. IMPACT OF THE ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES ON STUDENT’S ACHIEVEMENT WITH RESPECT TO DOUBLE INTEGRALS IN MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS. Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University. 2019;(3):83-91.

Views: 383


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2306-5079 (Print)