APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF ACCELERATION, COMPLICATION AND DEEPENING IN THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN MATHEMATICS LESSONS

A differentiated approach to teaching is one of the necessary conditions for humanization in education and plays a crucial role in the development of abilities, skills, and cognition of students. The teaching of Mathematics has extensive global experience of differentiated instruction. Differentiation was considered from the point of view of in- depth study of Mathematics in high school, the provision of assignments of different levels of complexity, resources, the pace of learning by students, individualization and personalization of teaching, etc. Modern pedagogy in the context of the humanization of teaching considers differentiation through orientation to the student, his needs and abilities to achieve the learning goals by all students in the classroom. There are three main principles for applying differentiation: acceleration, complication, and deepening. This article provides the literature review on differentiation in the classroom, its principles. An example of the application of the principles of differentiation in the lesson, examples of assignments in the process of formative assessment, and the results of the study are provided in the article.

1. VanTassel-Baska, J., Wood, S. (2009) The Integrated Curriculum Model. In J. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models in gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 655-691). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

2. Yakimanskaya I.S. (2000) Tekhnologiya lichnostno-orientirovannogo obrazovaniya. M.: Sentyabr. – 176s. (In Russian)

3. Rubinshtejn S.L. (1958) O myshlenii i putyakh ego issledovaniya. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR. - 147s. (In Russian)

4. Likhanova N.N. (2010) Tekhnologiya differenczirovannogo obucheniya kak faktor preemstvennosti // Vestnik pedagogicheskikh innovaczij #3(23). (In Russian)

5. ТОО «Bilim Media Group» (2017) Trendy sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Almaty: ТОО «Bilim Media Group». – 326 s. (In Russian)

6. Orr R. (2019) 100 idej dlya uchitelej nachal`noj shkoly`: differencziacziya. Nur-Sultan: Ulttyk audarma byurosy. – 132 s. (In Russian)

7. Dorofeev G.V., Kuzneczova L.V., Suvorova S.B., Firsov V.V. (1990) Differencziacziya v obuchenii matematike // Matematika v shkole. # 4. S. 15-21. (In Russian)

8. Gusev V.A. (1990) Individualizacziya uchebnoj deyatel`nosti uchashhikhsya kak osnova differenczirovannogo obucheniya matematike v srednej shkole //Matematika v shkole. 4 klass. S.27-31. (In Russian)

9. Skotnikova N.M. (1998) Differenczirovannaya zachetnaya sistema kontrolya i oczenki deyatelnosti uchashhikhsya 5-6 klassov pri obuchenii matematike: Dis. ... kand. ped. nauk : 13.00.02 : SPb.130 s. (In Russian)

10. Uteeva R.A. (1998) Teoreticheskie osnovy organizaczii uchebnoj deyatelnosti uchashhikhsya pri differenczirovannom obuchenii matematike v srednej shkole: Dis. ... d-ra ped. nauk : 13.00.02 : Moskva, 1998. (In Russian)

11. Utegenova B.M., Smaglij T.I., Onishhenko E.A. (2017) Osnovy differencziaczii prepodavaniya i obucheniya v sovremennoj shkole. Kostanaj: KGPI. - 98 s. (In Russian)

12. Zhunisbekova Zh.A. (2015) Differenczirovannoe obuchenie uchashhikhsya // Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamentalnykh issledovanij # 11-5. S. 748-751. (In Russian)

13. Nurgabyl D.N., Shaken M.M. (2020) Razrabotka strukturnykh elementov i instrumentariev kriterialnogo oczenivaniya uchebnykh dostizhenij uchashhikhsya // Vestnik Kazakhskogo Naczionalnogo zhenskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta #4(84). S. 16-22. (In Russian)

14. AOO «Nazarbaev Intellektualnye shkoly» (2012) Programma «Razvitie odarennosti detej» AOO NISh. (In Russian)

15. Vygotskij L.S. (1983) Voprosy detskoj (vozrastnoj) psikhologii. Sobr. soch.: V 6 t. T.4. (In Russian)

16. Confrey, J., Toutkoushian, E., & Shah, M. (2020) Working at scale to initiate ongoing validation of learning trajectory-based classroom assessments for middle grade mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Vol.60. P. 100818.