THE ROLE OF PRECURSORS IN REDUCING THE HARMFULNESS OF FUSARIUM ROT OF SUGAR BEET ROOTS
Abstract
Long-term studies of the zone of sugar beet cultivation in Kazakhstan show that the shorter the interval between beet crops in one place, the greater the risk of contamination with root rot. So on farms where beets were returned to the previous site in 1-2 years, the prevalence of rot was as high as 78.9%. The least manifestation of rot was observed in crop rotations, where the beet was returned to its former place no earlier than 8 years or more, that is, the field was virtually free of soil infection. Here, the affection of root crops was 9.8%, which in turn contributed to an increase in yield (334-425 q / ha).
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. MauiKazakhstan
Dr. Sci. (Biologу), Prof.
Almaty
L. E. Anuarova
Kazakhstan
Cand. Sci. (Biologу) associate professor
Almaty
M. Aitzhanova
Kazakhstan
senior teacher
Almaty
References
1. Vilchesh S. Parasitism and pathogenesis of fungi that cause root diseases: Trans. from English. // Problems and achievements of phytopathology. - Moscow: Izdat. s.-. literature, magazines and posters. - 1962. - P.427-443 (in Russ.)
2. Kalmykova N.A., Gogol L.A., Rodionova L.I. Formation of Microbial Soil Communities in Intensive Sugar Beet Rotations // Mikrobiol. Journal. - 1994. - 56, №2. - P.100 (in Russ.)
3. Shinkov I.F. Sugar beet crop rotation: Agro recommendations for cultivation of sugar beet in Kyrgyzstan. - Frunze, 1969. -10-20 (in Russ.)
4. Babayan A. To the system of agrotechnical and preventive measures in the fight against the verticilliose wilt of cotton // Cotton. - 1969. - № 7. - P. 41-46
5. Gubanov G.Ya., Sabirov B.G. Fusarium wilt of cotton // Tashkent: Fan, 1977. -96 p.
6. Benken A.A., Dotsenko A.S. Conditions of germination of microsclerotia in soil // Mycology and phytopathology. - 1970. - P. 351-353 (in Russ.)
7. Kornienko A.S. Modern problems of protection of sugar beet from diseases with the industrial technology of its cultivation // Integr. syst. protection of sugar beet from harm., disease., and weeds. - K.: VNIS. - 1986. - P. 62-70 (in Russ.)
8. Pozhar Z.A. Increase of sugar content and technological qualities of sugar beet under the influence of methods of combating diseases // Basis povysh. saccharine and technology. qualities of sugar beet. - K.: VNIS. - 1986. - P.48-55
9. Khovanskaya, KN Agrotechnics in the struggle against the corn root and the rotting of sugar beet // Science and before. experience in proizv. - K.: VNIS. - 1965. - P. 251-255. (in Russ.)
10. Yarmukhamedov R.Kh., Chebolda E.V. Change of productive and technological indicators of sugar beet depending on permanent cultivation and predecessors // Abstracts of scientific papers. conference. young scientists KirgNiz. - Frunze. - 1973. - P. 35 (in Russ.)
11. Maui A.A. Diseases of root crops of sugar beet. Almaty. 2009 P.231 (in Russ.)
12. Мауи А.А., Толебай Ж. Симптомы и биологические особенности возбудителя ризомании сахарной свеклы. ВестникКазахскогогосударственногоженскогопедагогическогоуниверситета, 2016, №6, с.30-36
13. Afanasiev M.M., Baldridge D.E. Selection for the resistance and chemical control of Rhizoctonia root rot disease of sugar beets // J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Tech. -1968. - 15, №2. - P. 428-443
14. Agrotechnical methods of protection of sugar beet from pests, diseases and weeds: Recommendations / Fire Z.A, Kolomiets A.P., Tishenko E.I. and others - M .: Agropromizdat, 1988. – 21р (in Russ.)
15. Orekhova V.A. Control of the root cane of sugar beet in the Altai Territory. In: Effect. measures to protect sugar beet from disease. with the Indian. technol. its rises. - K.: VNIS. - 1986. - P.45-48
16. Bilay V.I. Fusariums. - K.: Naukova dumka, 1977. – 442 p. (in Russ.)
17. Barshtein L.A., Baranovsky V.D. Концентрація цукрових буряків у сівозміні // Tsukrovi Buryaks. - 1998. - №3. - P. 11-12 (in Ukr.)
18. Ermekova B.D. Micromycetes of cultivated soils in Kazakhstan (winter wheat and sugar beet): Abstract. dis. ... Doctor of Biol. Sciences .: 03.00.05. and 03.00.24 / Ін-т. botany and phytointer. AN Rep. Kazakhstan. - Almaty, 1997. - 46s. (in Russ.)
19. Zemlyanoi A.I., Pyatkovskii N.K. The susceptibility of sugar beet to root and cercosporosis depending on the location of its crops in the crop rotation // Effect. measures to combat disease. and it hurts. with int. tech. increase. sugar beet- K.: VNIS. - 1990. - P.27-30 (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Maui A.A., Anuarova L.E., Aitzhanova M. THE ROLE OF PRECURSORS IN REDUCING THE HARMFULNESS OF FUSARIUM ROT OF SUGAR BEET ROOTS. Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University. 2018;(1):6-12.