Degenderisation of paid and unpaid work in Kazakhstan?

The current article applies theoretical framework of degenderisation and aims to explore to what degree women are degenderised by state policies in the labour market and unpaid work in Kazakhstan. The study applied the qualitative research method of semi-structured focus group discussion among 30 women from Almaty and Turkestan. The findings in the current research demonstrate that women’s paid work in the labour market and unpaid work at home do not prove the degenderisation, but rather confirm genderisation process. Women bear costs of emotional, social and time resources as a result of motherhood, which results in them fulfilling less of their potential in professional sphere. There is also a strong influence of cultural factor that causes women to prevent the degenderisation and reinforces genderisation in unpaid work due to their beliefs in traditional gender roles and division of labour in family. The research contributes to theoretical significance by applying theory developed by Western authors, degenderisation, to the case of Kazakhstan.

1. Leitner, S. and Lessenich, S. (2007). Dependence as dependent variable: conceptualizing and measuring ‘de‐familization’. in Clasen, J. and Siegel, N.A. (Eds). Investigating Welfare State Change: The “Dependent Variable Problem” in Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 244‐260.

2. Saxonberg, S. (2013). From Defamilization to Degenderization: Toward a New Welfare Typology. Social Policy & administration. 47 (1): 26-49.

3. Bambra, C. (2007). Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: a cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare. 16: 326-338.

4. Lewis, J. and Giullari, S. (2006). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: the search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society. 34 (1): 76- 104.

5. Ryskaliyev, D., Mirzaliyeva, A., Tursynbayeva, G., Muratova, E., Buribayev, Y. and Khamzina, Z. (2019). Gender Inequality Among Employees in Kazakhstan. The Lawyer Quarterly. 9 (4).

6. Khairullayeva, V., Sarybayev, M., Kuzembayeva, A., Yermekbayev, A. and Balkushikova, G. (2022). Gender Policy in Kazakhstan. Journal of International Women’s Studies. 24 (1).

7. Atakhanova, Z. and Howie, P. (2022). Women in Kazakhstan’s Energy Industries: Implications for Energy Transition. Energies. 15 (13).

8. Rodionov, A., Sabitov, Z., Gainous, J., Wagner, K., Bekmagambetov, A. and Rodionova, K. (2021). Economic Growth and the Feminisation of Political Science in Kazakhstan: A Leaky Pipeline? Europe-Asia Studies.

9. Yanovskaya, O. and Lipovka, A. (2022). Gender Stereotypes and Family Decision-Making: Comparative Study of Central Europe and Central Asia. Central European Management Journal. 30 (3).

10. Agency for strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan bureau of national statistics. (2021). Gender statistics. Agency for strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan bureau of national statistics. Available from: Accessed on 12 December 2022.

11. Agency for strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan bureau of national statistics. (2019b). Share of employed people by groups of types of economic activities, by sex. Agency for strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan bureau of national statistics. Available from: Accessed on 22 October 2022.

12. Vlast. (2020). Being self-employed in Kazakhstan. Vlast. Available from: Accessed on 18 November 2022.

13. Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H. and Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 6 (5): 100-111.

14. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. and Mukherjee, N. (2018).The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 9 (1): 20- 32.

15. Noy, C. (2006). Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 11 (4): 327-344.

16. Thompson, S. (2002). Sampling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

17. Kazakh Invest, 2020). Economy. Kazakh Invest. Available from: Accessed on 23 August 2022.

18. Makhmutova, M. (2012). Internal Migration of Young People in Kazakhstan: case study of Almaty. Public Policy Research Center. Available from: Accessed on 23 August 2022.

19. Agency for strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan bureau of national statistics.(2021A). Demographic statistics. Agency for strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan bureau of national statistics. Available from: Accessed on 25 August 2022.

20. Friedrich Ebert Foundation. (2020). Values of Kazakhstan society. Friedrich Ebert Foundation. Available from: Accessed on 25 August 2022.

21. Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 12 (3): 297– 298.

22. International Labour Organization. (1994). C175 - Part-Time Work Convention, 1994 (No. 175). International Labour Organization. Available from: Accessed on 21 November 2022.

23. Kuzhabekova, A., Janenova, S. and Almukhambetova, A. (2017). Analyzing the Experiences of Female Leaders in Civil Service in Kazakhstan: Trapped between Economic Pressure to Earn and Traditional Family Role Expectations. International Journal of Public Administration. 41:15: 1290-1301.

24. Khamzina, Z., Buribayev, B., Taitorina, B. and Baisalova, G. (2021). Gender Equality in Employment: A View from Kazakhstan. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias. 93 (4): 1-14.

25. Kargabayeva, S., Berdaliyeva, G. and Kargabayeva D. (2019). The Necessity of Forming Superflexible Companies in Kazakhstan. Vestnik. 1 (127): 245-256.